I don't think it make sense to have resource pools configured if all VMs in cluster have same priority but I have a reason to think it make sense to have resource pools based on following factors.
- Lets say I have 2 RPs and I don't want one RP VMs which are highly utilised impact other RP VM. This logic triggers only when there is resource contention.
- When there is no resource contention, RP's doesn't play any role
I believe if there is no resource contention, clusters/ resources behave like there are no RPs configured, is it correct?
Above comments are based on assumption RPs are configured with default values.